A proposito di munk

Descrizione:

Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webdisk
Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you should pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage along with the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.

웹하드 순위 The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, so the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.


It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files over the Internet at a set monthly cost. Therefore the application of web hard has become common.



But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also leads to security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.


In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.