- Registrato da: 13 Gennaio 2022
file down site
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only must be in a folder.
You will need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it's in that state, you have to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.
Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.
There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.
If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.
p2p 순위 The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.